Just how many of these potentially polyandrous unions had been its polyandrous? An educated hint originates from the unique registration concept during the Mende Pattu. Dining table dos implies that a quarter of your own potentially polyandrous aunt groups within this area have been in fact joined kuumat puola-naiset as a result. We do not know whether they was consistent within this notation along the section. Indeed, among the first 2,five hundred (of 10,076 registered persons), perhaps not an individual polyandrous connection is filed, though there was indeed a lot of prospective ones. When we ignore those very first 2,five hundred ideas, the new show from joined polyandrous brothers goes up so you’re able to 32%. The newest Mende thombos and additionally simplify one, actually, fraternal polyandry of a few brothers is actually the fresh dominant development. Within just one instance away from 102, we discover around three brothers revealing a wife. However, besides 102 brother cases, we find nine cases of cousins or any other kin combos. Meaning one to 8.0% regarding men and you may 5.5% regarding adult female lived-in some form of polyandry contained in this city. 6% (N = 2,094) and you can seven.2% (N = 1,528). Slightly puzzling ‘s the discussing away from brothers-in-laws or sons-in-law of lead discussing a spouse. I’ve not provided them about dining table, while we don’t know whether or not they was brothers every single other.
We do not understand as to why the brand new thombo authorities contained in this region chose to check in polyandry, this provides some kind of legitimacy to a relationship you to contravened most of the Dutch regulations
The first thombo registration for the Galle also provides another chance to guess polyandry by the deciding on mature brothers in reality discussing a home. Table 2 means that 50 % of the latest potentially polyandrous brothers for the Galle province for the 1695/6 resided together in the same dwelling. The latest Galle thombos together with – exclusively – talk about attendance regarding students within Protestant universities. Footnote 65 Once we evaluate college attendance out-of youngsters from parents with polyandrous unions to people versus for example unions we come across zero difference: 17% of your boys went along to school inside low-polyandrous household (N = 1,630 boys), and have now 17% out-of boys during the polyandrous group (Letter = 166). The latest data for the girls is, respectively seven% (Letter = step 1,241) and 6% (Letter = 98). Footnote 66 We are able to ending you to definitely polyandry didn’t prevent baptism nor university attendance, and therefore, in contrast, the fresh new schoolmasters did not reject college students regarding ‘immoral’ parents.
Footnote 64 When we discard the original 2,500 ideas instead of proof polyandry, we reach respectively 10
Precisely what does this write to us regarding total chance out of polyandry? We could properly believe that on the a quarter to 1 / 2 of most of the potentially polyandrous brothers have been in fact living in a beneficial polyandrous connection. We can now move on to a good recalculation out of Desk 2. Inside Galle inside 1695/six potentially polyandrous unions was included in twenty two.6% off household members teams. It commission is going to be recalculated as being polyandrous unions inside 5.7–eleven.3% away from family members organizations (25–50% off 22.6). Within the Mende inside 1760 we know it is eleven.3% (or 18% in the event the very first 2,five-hundred information is deal); inside the Udugaha inside the 1760 it is no less than fifteen–30%, along with Negombo it is just dos.7–5.3%. Ergo, in Dutch period, polyandry are quite common throughout the Lowlands, especially in the new rural components bordering towards the Kandy. But it is certainly less frequent throughout the quick seaside regions which was lower than colonial influence the fresh longest. We can discover which on the port from Negombo needless to say, also about Galle section. Right here, 7.6% out of household way of living close to new coast (N = 237) contained polyandrous unions as opposed to a dozen.1% out-of household from the indoor villages (= 576). Which, but not, cannot fundamentally mean this was an effect regarding colonial coverage otherwise social determine. Seaside teams was basically will engaged in some other job, compared to the fresh new hinterlands where subsistence agriculture is widespread. More over, or then, (caste) class were some other this kind of countries as well. Both are you can easily signs one various methods away from way of living have been already present anywhere between littoral and you may inland communities to have a lengthier lifetime of time, Footnote 67 and further expose you to definitely polyandry was mostly present around agricultural household.